Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Monday, November 10, 2008
The War of the Browsers
Since the fall of Netscape, Internet Explorer held 90% market share for years to come. No one, back then, though possible that anyone could pose a threat to IE or Microsoft. With the advent of Firefox in November of 2004, everything changed forever. People started to question the superiority of IE. Moreover Apple made an impressive comeback the last few years, with the use of the BSD kernel and the Vista bad press. So it came as no suprise that when Safari came to Windows, many people tried it (especially Mac users who also use Windows). Opera was always considered a fast and innovative browser, the first to have tabbed browsing, but for some strange reason most users considered it their second choice behind Firefox or IE. Last but not least, is of course Google Chrome. Having the brand name of Google, that most love and the rest love to hate, it is definitely heading for success.
So, what are the pros and cons of each browser?
FIREFOX
pros:
INTERNET EXPLORER
Pros:
SAFARI:
Pros:
GOOGLE CHROME:
Pros:
Cons:
OPERA
pros:
Conclusion:
Internet Explorer will keep losing market share, unless IE 8 surpasses all expectations and becomes as good as the rest.
Firefox may lose some share to Chrome (although the Yahoo promotion will likely offshet it in the expense of IE), or may be aquired by Google in the future. After all, most of Mozilla Foundation's funding comes from Google.
Safari will keep gaining market share, as long as Mac sales are rising.
Chrome will become a top player shortly, when the initial bugs are squashed and add-ons are made available.
Grim days seem to come for Opera. Although in technology terms it is great, users just don't use it... It should become open source as soon as possible.
Maybe a merge of Firefox, Chrome & Opera will give THE ULTIMATE BROWSER in the future and take web to the next level (whatever that may be...!!). But i guess this is just me daydreaming...
*If you think you have any privacy at all, whatever browser you may be using, click the w3counter widget on the top right of the blog. You will see evrything about who visited the blog:IP,country,OS,browser! Need more??
So, what are the pros and cons of each browser?
FIREFOX
pros:
- Fast, second only to chrome, but in the next version 3.1, it will be the fastest again.
- Secure: Issues are patched faster than any other browser, has many security features (also available in opera & safari).
- Flexible: Firefox's add-ons are simply the best and more numerous than all other browsers combined.
- Excellent compatibility with almost every single web site.
- Geatly reduced memory consumption in version 3, which was the biggest problem in past vesrions.
- Runs natively under Windows, Linux, Mac and BSD.
- Supported financially by Googled and promoted by Yahoo(in response to Chrome, obviously)
- Open source.
- Needs more system resources than webkit based browsers
- No mobile version yet.
INTERNET EXPLORER
Pros:
- Preinstalled in Windows.
- Version 8 is a big improvement compared to 7 in terms of speed.
- Thanks to competition, it is finally becoming a decent broswer.
- Does not run natively under Linux, Mac and BSD.
- Very slow compared to the others (even 20 times in some javascript tests). Uses a lot of system resources.
- Bad security record.
- Proprietary, closed source.
- Bad publicity for Microsoft last two years, mostly because of Vista.
SAFARI:
Pros:
- Preinstalled & greatly integrated in Mac & iPhone.
- Secure.
- Fast: Webkit(on which it is based) is fast and does not use many resources.
- Excellent compatibility with almost every single web site.
- Does not run natively under Linux and BSD.
- Proprietary, closed source.
GOOGLE CHROME:
Pros:
- Multi-threading technology keeps chrome alive, even if one tab crashes.
- The fastest browser this moment (until Firefox 3.1 comes out)
- Based on Webkit, like Safari, which means excellent compatibility with almost every single web site.
- Open Source. (under the name Chromium)
- Will run natively on all platforms after some time.
- Even better address bar than Firefox (gives the first Googled result, as an option, while you type)
Cons:
- No add-ons yet, though this will definitely change in the future, since it is open source.
- Many users don't trust Google in terms of privacy.*
- Excellent compatibility has not been achieved yet.
- Google has showed in the past that it can have a beta for years (cough..Gmail,cough..Why still beta??It rocks!)
OPERA
pros:
- fast: Until Firefox 3 and Chrome, it was the fastest brower. It is still close on terms of speed.
- Had great features like tabbed browsing, before any other broswer.
- Secure.
- Runs natively under Windows, Linux, Mac and BSD.
- Does not use many resources.
- Best option for mobile phones.
- Inexplicable low market share...(1%)
- Proprietary, closed source.
Conclusion:
Internet Explorer will keep losing market share, unless IE 8 surpasses all expectations and becomes as good as the rest.
Firefox may lose some share to Chrome (although the Yahoo promotion will likely offshet it in the expense of IE), or may be aquired by Google in the future. After all, most of Mozilla Foundation's funding comes from Google.
Safari will keep gaining market share, as long as Mac sales are rising.
Chrome will become a top player shortly, when the initial bugs are squashed and add-ons are made available.
Grim days seem to come for Opera. Although in technology terms it is great, users just don't use it... It should become open source as soon as possible.
Maybe a merge of Firefox, Chrome & Opera will give THE ULTIMATE BROWSER in the future and take web to the next level (whatever that may be...!!). But i guess this is just me daydreaming...
*If you think you have any privacy at all, whatever browser you may be using, click the w3counter widget on the top right of the blog. You will see evrything about who visited the blog:IP,country,OS,browser! Need more??
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Monday, November 3, 2008
How user-friendly are Windows really?
A common thing we hear every now and then is that "my friends use Windows, so whenever i have a problem, they help me". Since 90% of the world are Windows users, the above must be correct, right?? Not quite in my way of thinking.
First of all, let's see the profile of advanced users: A very big portion of advanced IT users, such as sysadmins, programmers, web developers, network administrators, etc are Linux users as well. These are also the people who help others with their Windows problems. Most of those do not use Vista at all, nor do they plan to use "Windows 7". This means that they do not know Vista as well as they knew XP and their Windows skills are no longer honed, since they use Windows less and less each passing day. For example, i use Linux exclusively for 1,5 year and Windows only when i am forced to (when i forget to take my bootable Ubuntu usb with with me).
Getting help for Vista or Windows 7 is becoming increasing difficult since many advanced users simply slowly forget how to use it. On the other hand geting help for Linux gets increasingly easier, since more and more people use it and new distributions get a lot easier with each new version. The only thing that new Linux users need to be shown is how to install programs. After that, they can do almost anything; surf the web, write their documents get their emails, play some games, update their system and all this without having to worry about viruses, spyware, registry problems or defragmentation.
First of all, let's see the profile of advanced users: A very big portion of advanced IT users, such as sysadmins, programmers, web developers, network administrators, etc are Linux users as well. These are also the people who help others with their Windows problems. Most of those do not use Vista at all, nor do they plan to use "Windows 7". This means that they do not know Vista as well as they knew XP and their Windows skills are no longer honed, since they use Windows less and less each passing day. For example, i use Linux exclusively for 1,5 year and Windows only when i am forced to (when i forget to take my bootable Ubuntu usb with with me).
Getting help for Vista or Windows 7 is becoming increasing difficult since many advanced users simply slowly forget how to use it. On the other hand geting help for Linux gets increasingly easier, since more and more people use it and new distributions get a lot easier with each new version. The only thing that new Linux users need to be shown is how to install programs. After that, they can do almost anything; surf the web, write their documents get their emails, play some games, update their system and all this without having to worry about viruses, spyware, registry problems or defragmentation.
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Year of Linux Desktop is finally here! (If last year wasn't!)
It is finally happening!
Everyone these days seems to be trying Linux. In the whole 2007, i only managed to get 1 user to Linux but since last week, 2 of my superiors asked me to make dual boot (XP-Ubuntu) and 2 other colleagues bought the Linux version of Acer Aspire One!! And more have told me that they plan to try Ubuntu very soon.
Ubuntu has just become so great that anyone can use it and maintain it easier than XP and a lot easier than Vista. (After someone shows him/her how to install a program).
Also, use of Red Hat in our Application Servers has got on the table and is no longer dismissed without even the slightest consideration.
I strongly believe that the last 12 months were the Year of Linux Desktop (or netbook if you prefer...). If you think it wasn't, then this year will definitely be!
Everyone these days seems to be trying Linux. In the whole 2007, i only managed to get 1 user to Linux but since last week, 2 of my superiors asked me to make dual boot (XP-Ubuntu) and 2 other colleagues bought the Linux version of Acer Aspire One!! And more have told me that they plan to try Ubuntu very soon.
Ubuntu has just become so great that anyone can use it and maintain it easier than XP and a lot easier than Vista. (After someone shows him/her how to install a program).
Also, use of Red Hat in our Application Servers has got on the table and is no longer dismissed without even the slightest consideration.
I strongly believe that the last 12 months were the Year of Linux Desktop (or netbook if you prefer...). If you think it wasn't, then this year will definitely be!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)